Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 9000 5G Specification & Benchmarks Compared – What we know so far

It’s that time of the year again where chipset manufacturers announce their latest flagship chipsets for the up and coming year.

We have already seen Huawei’s offering with the HiSilicon Kirin 900 5G with its absolute beast of a GPU configuration. MediaTek should be next up this week with their virtual summit on the 10th of November.

Then Qualcomm and Samsung are yet to announce their chipset, with the Snapdragon 875 being officially unveiled in December.

As always, several leaks have started to come through, giving us an idea of what to expect. The up and coming Xiaomi Mi 11b appears to be the source of many of these leaks.

With this information being based on leaks, it quite likely could be inaccurate.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Kirin 9000 vs Exynos 2100 Specifications Comparison

SoC Snapdragon 875 Exynos 2100 Kirin 9000 5G
CPU 1x ARM Cortex-X1 @ 2.84 GHz 1x ARM Cortex-X1 @ 2.91Ghz 1x Cortex A77
@ 3.13Ghz
3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.42 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.81Ghz 3x Cortex A77
@ 2.54Ghz
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.21Ghz 4x Cortex A55@
GPU Qualcomm Adreno 660 Mali-G78 MP Mali-G78
24 Cores
APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP Hexagon 698

2 big core, 1 tiny core

Memory ? 4x 16-bit CH
@ 2133MHz LPDDR4X / 33.4GB/s
@ 2750MHz LPDDR5 / 44.0GB/s
3MB system level cache
ISP/Camera ? Dual 14-bit Spectra 480 ISP

quad-core, 6th gen ISP

Integrated Modem ? external X55
(5G NR Sub-6 + mmWave)
DL = 7000 Mbps
UL = 3000 Mbps
Balong 5000
4G + 5G NR NSA+SA Sub-6GHz
Process TSMC
7nm (N7P)

This year Arm announced a new high-performance CPU, the Cortex-X1, with Qualcomm being the first to implement it.

The Cortex-X1 has a 30% higher peak performance than the Cortex-A77 and is 23% faster than the new Cortex-A78 at integer calculations. Additionally, it has double the machine learning abilities.

This should likely give the Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 a significant performance advantage with the CPU over the Kirin 9000 5G. While that chipset uses the older Arm Cortex A77 cores, it makes up for it with the higher clocks.

Less is known about the Samsung Exynos 2100, but they have ditched their custom cores in favour of Arm this year, and initial leaks indicate that it will have higher frequencies across all cores than the Qualcomm.

While it is hard to predict how the Qualcomm GPU will perform, both Huawei and Samsung use the Mali-G78 GPU. Huawei has gone all out with a massive 24 cores on their chipset, but at the moment we don’t know what Samsung has for their chipset.


Benchmarks for the SD875 and Exynos 2100 are a little thin on the ground at the moment.


Single-core Multi-core
Snapdragon 875 1,204 4,121
Snapdragon 875 Leak 2  1,105 3,512
Exynos 2100 1,323 4,215
Kirin 9000 5G 920 / 1020 3275 / 3704

There have been two leaks for the SD875 on Geekbench, showing similar results on the single-core but a bit of inconsistency on the multi-core.

For the Samsung, there has been one early leak for the Samsung Galaxy S21, but the results seem to tally up with the specification and the Qualcomm results.

The Kirin result is from reviews with the phone running as standard and in performance mode.


Snapdragon 875 847,868
Exynos 2100 ?
Kirin 9000 5G 531270 / 686835

I am a little sceptical of the one leaked Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 Antutu benchmark. With a reported score of 847868, this would make it 30% higher than the 647919 achieved by the ROG Phone 3 which uses the SD865+. If it is accurate, this would be amazing, but take it with a pinch of salt for now.

The Kirin 9000 has some interesting Antutu results, normally running a phone in performance mode doesn’t make that much of a difference, but there is almost a 30% improvement here.

This could indicate that the Mate 40 Pro throttles that massive GPU during regular use. Normally it is not worth the effort of putting your phone into performance mode for anything other than benchmarks, but in this case, if you are a gamer, it will likely be worth it. Just expect your battery to drain much faster.

Currently, there are no Antutu leaks for Samsung, while it should have a superior CPU, the benchmark could show the differences in performance between Adreno and Mali based GPUs


With everything being based on leaks it is too early to draw any conclusions about one chipset.

Flagship chipsets are always the most exciting launch of the year as they introduce cutting edge technology. This year we will see the Cortex-X1 and the new A78, but we may also see other innovations. I am cautiously optimistic that Qualcomm may introduce Wi-Fi 6E on the Snapdragon 875 which will pave way routers and other client devices to launch.

In terms of performance, while it is always amazing to see big new numbers achieved, in reality, I have found that chipsets are so good now that it doesn’t really make much difference in my real-world usage. Performance numbers are more important with the mid-range chipsets, where this year we have seen a range of affordable 5G chipsets that more than enough performance that your average user doesn’t need to worry about spending £1k on a flagship phone.

We also have the up and coming MediaTek chipset, what it will be called, how it will perform and when it will be implemented on the phone, all remains in question. It is likely that it won’t win any performance crowns but it will almost certainly offer better bang for your buck than some of the premium-priced Qualcomm based phones.

Posted by Mighty Gadget Blog: UK Technology News and Reviews

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest

Leave a comment

Why You Need A Website